Which outlier is more perverse: Milton Patterson or Corky Simpson?
Archive for the ‘local politics’ Category
Simple Question
Friday, January 9th, 2009I Voted
Tuesday, November 4th, 2008Turnout in my precinct looks to be huge. My neighborhood’s what I suppose you’d call black, middle-class. Most of the housing is in single-family residences, most of them are owner-occupied. To turn a Dave Chappelle joke on its head: I am the white neighborhood in it, although my next door neighbors are from Mexico and the family three houses down are from Vietnam (the parents, at least).
Our precinct used to use butterfly punch-card ballots, but since the 2006 election, we use paper ballots that are read and counted optically. After filling out the ballot, you stick it into the machine and if there are no problems reading it, the ballot drops into a bin and the number on the display increments by one. I was the 299th voter today and the house was packed when I was there. Voting in the primaries, I was the 17th, although I was an hour earlier to the polls then. Only 338 citizens voted in my precinct in that election—you can see me there as the lone voter for Fred, who had already dropped out of the race.
The woman behind me in line to get a ballot today was a first-time voter in her upper twenties and the two women in the two booths to my right probably were on the lower end of the 18-24 demographic, judging by their voices and the content of their conversation carried on through the canvas walls of the booths: “Who should I vote for? I don’t know any of these people!” I assume they were at the part about keeping judges, which is a pretty hard call for a lot of people, I suppose. I seach the internet for the judges’ names before the election to make sure none of them are loonies or legal incompetents—if no evidence exists that they are, I vote them back on. I enthusiastically voted to retain Judge Tom DiFanis on the strength of this story, preserved at Illinipundit and copy-pasted here:
Some people showing up for jury duty at the Champaign County Courthouse in Urbana this morning were sent home, not because there were no trials for them to hear but because construction had displaced them.“We’ve got no place to put these jurors,” an irritated Presiding Judge Tom Difanis said this morning. “What am I going to do with them? Have them stand in the construction area?”
Tuckpointing on the old courthouse began last week in advance of the renovation of the courthouse bell tower. The work means that the jury assembly room, on the first floor of the old courthouse at the west end of the courthouse complex, will be out of commission for several months.
“They (county administrators) had their timetable, and we just merely suggested that they make a place for us to put our jurors and they haven’t,” Difanis said this morning. “I’ve been with Champaign County going on 36 years. It really doesn’t surprise me we’re this inept.”
The man’s in touch with the voters.
It doesn’t matter much who I voted for. Unless a deplorable fraud happens, the electoral collegian representing me here in Illinois will be voting for Barack Obama. Dick Durbin will win re-election in a landslide. I’ll be interested to see how local offices turn out. I imagine that a great many first-time Obama voters will vote straight-party tickets for the Democratic Party candidates. Some may choose not to vote for those offices.
So, to sum up, turnout in my precinct looks excellent—it was pleasing to see evidence of new voters taking up their responsibility to elect our government. Returns will be posted by Mark Sheldon here as they come in tonight. Here’s hoping my like-minded brethren in the battleground states get out and vote in droves. Otherwise, here’s some sincere hoping that I’m wrong about Obama and Colin Powell, Boxcar, and almost all of my friends are right about him. Not that any of us know anything about him except what he and his aides have told us.
Here’s an interesting essay for you. Naturally, I greatly admire Nate Silver’s work on baseball. We’ll see in a short while how good his political analysis is. It’s a long essay—here’s an excerpt to give you enough of a taste to tell you whether it’ll pique your interest:
Lying to pollsters is frequent and a necessity in Pennslyvania due to the unions. Many union bosses will call their members, posing as a ‘pollster’, and if the member gives the wrong asnwer, a thug is sent to the house. The Teacher’s Union there has sent strict orders to vote for Obama “or else”.
I don’t find that in the least bit hard to believe. We could be in for a ride, believe it or not. (Hat tip to Jim Treacher for the pointer. (Do we still tip hats?))
Last Chance
Thursday, October 16th, 2008Viewership will be down for tonight’s debate, no doubt, but the number of Americans still seeking a candidate to best represent their priorities has dwindled down to some 7-8% of registered voters, if the polls are to be believed.
Media hype Expectations are that McCain will come out fighting “dirty”, he’ll continue to point out Obama’s long-standing, formative relationships with certain fools and blowhards who’ve dedicated their lives to subverting American interests like Bill Ayers and Tony Rezko (but not Wright, Khalidi, or Odinga ‘cuz that’d be divisive.)
I imagine he’ll mention Ayers as an aside—Obama may or may not take the bait. Something I’ve noticed about Obama is that he refuses to admit when he’s wrong—to this day, he attempts to justify his primary debate gaffe of committing to president-level talks with Iran’s (puppet) head of (mis-)government. In the first debate, he appealed to authority by claiming Henry Kissinger agrees with him—the logical fallacy backfired when Kissinger called BS. In this case, Obama isn’t wrong so much as he’s backed into a corner by telling contradictory stories about his relationship with Ayers.
That’d be a waste of time for McCain, though. He needs to defend his fiscal plans and his healthcare plan, both of which I think are good ideas. He does need to go on the attack though, particularly against Obama’s “95% of Americans get a tax cut” BS. He should quit working to distance himself from Bush and should instead distance Obama from Clinton and those happy days of a good economy and a friendly press. Obama’s tax plan essentially undoes all the (highly successful) welfare reform of the Clinton era by directly redistributing wealth via the IRS. If he doesn’t point out that somewhere around 40% of Americans don’t pay any Federal Income Tax, he will have failed, in my opinion.
I’d also like to see McCain give a quick, correct answer to a simple question and stop talking. That’s extremely unlikely.
8:09 — What the hell. I’ll crack a beer and liveblog this. Obama’s talking about the 95% tax cut thing. Jump on it, McCain.
8:11 — So far, he’s said that business owners should spread the wealth around instead of the government. Good, but not the swing he needs to take. Obama comes back with the 95% claim again and starts class-warfaring.
8:13 — Interesting obfuscation lexical choices just used and that I’ve noticed over the two-year campaign: Obama calls tax ‘n spend policy “investment”; McCain’s taken to calling the corporate income tax, “business tax”.
8:15 — Obama wants to go through the Federal Budget line-by-line and cut expenses to pay for his policy of a unicorn for every man, woman, and child. Unfortunately, or rather fortunately for balance of power reasons, congress didn’t pass the line-item veto bill back in the George H.W. Bush administration.
8:17 — McCain’s memorized sequence of “all of the above” energy sources is stale, man. He should be talking about electrical grid improvements by now.
8:18 — McCain suddenly wants a line-item veto, too. I’d much, much prefer genuine transparency in appropriations and legislation.
8:20 — McCain’s distancing himself from Bush. He doesn’t listen to me. Obama’s complaint was that Bush allowed the deficit to explode. I’ll be at the front of the line to ridicule Bush for failing to veto the ridiculous spending bills that he signed into law, but it’s not like his 8 years in office were normal 8 years. There was a lot of expensive work that had to be done oversees over those years and as we’ve learned lately, congress doesn’t do anything unless they’re bribed to do it.
8:23 — Unruly audience tonight. These kids have no self-control… Not the Hofstra students, but the press.
8:25 — McCain shouldn’t waste his time with distancing himself from Bush anymore. Nobody who’s still ready to be swayed is going to buy that argument at this point.
8:25 — Schieffer claims the campaigns are nasty, listing a series of terms the Obama campaign has thrown at McCain—leaving out the ‘dishonorable’ one that I find offensive. Schieffer wants McCain to tell Obama to his face that he’s friends of Bill Ayers. McCain took the opportunity to play the victim.
8:27 — I’m pretty disappointed McCain didn’t go after Obama’s tax plan, which would’ve been effective. Somebody in his campaign must know what a refundable tax credit is, since it’s the key of his healthcare plan.
8:28 — Obama claims 100% of McCain’s advertisements were negative. Law professors can’t do math.
8:30 — McCain throws much of Texas under the bus for a few Arizona voters. Points out the nation-wide negative attack ads. Obama’s running attack ads in freakin’ Illinois, man. We expect Obama to spend our money wisely?
8:32 — Obama’s playing to the NYT hype about McCain’s rallies gone wild and the twisted claims that McCain supporters want Obama to be killed. He complains that Americans have become too cynical about our politics. I’d prefer more cynicism. The Obamessiah fans who worship at this typical politician’s feet give me fear for the future of this nation. Of course, if he wins, they’ll be disillusioned out of politics until their thirties—when they’re decent taxpaying Joe twelve-packs. (Stolen bit)
8:35 — McCain just said, “Mr. Ayers… I don’t care about an old washed up terrorists.” Goes on about ACORN. Heh. Obama’s snickering into his notebook. Crazy old man, he thinks. And how about that, he took the bait. Now the press has to cover it.
8:37 — Obama thinks the Chicago Tribune is a Republican-leaning newspaper. And my butt can chew gum. At least that gives an indication of where he situates himself on the political spectrum.
8:39 — I think the point’s made, McCain. Obama’s lied about ten times in a row about some stuff that a lot of people may or may not care about. You got more important stuff to do. During his transition back to those issues, Obama snickers audibly. Guffaws perhaps.
8:41 — Joe Biden has never forgotten where he comes from. And Biden’s foreign policy chops are vastly overstated. He’s been wrong more often than not.
8:42 — A lot of people are going to flip out about McCain calling Palin a “role model for women.” I like her a great deal. She’s a talented politician and, as far as I can tell, a libertarian pragmatist with some strong socially conservative views that I imagine she’d only promote on a bully-pulpit basis if she becomes president someday. That’s what she’s been as governor of Alaska.
8:45 — McCain and I agree on something! Biden’s wrong more often than not on foreign policy issues.
8:47 — Energy policy, nice! Question: give me a number for how much we can reduce our foreign oil dependency. Yeah, right. McCain wants to quit buying oil from enemy states, does the alloftheabove sequence, wants to shift to nukes. Just say electric cars and trucks, man! The goal here is to get stuff into the press. People would like the idea of shifting some of the short-range trucking fleet into electric vehicles drawing from a nuke powered grid.
8:49 — It should be noted that Obama’s “use-em-or-lose-em” policy was swiped from the detested Sarah Palin… Then calls for the age-old increased energy efficiency mandates. Diversification, man. Gotta start there. Obama’s on his heels about free trade here. If McCain says, “Colombia,” I’ll be pleased.
8:51 — Cretins are going to call McCain racist for calling attention to Obama’s “eloquence.” If he would’ve said “nuance” it would have struck a more resonant chord. Code for BS, for foreign readers who came here instead of Obama’s $200 or less donations page.
8:53 — McCain said Colombia. I am pleased. Wiggle, Obama. Wiggle. He’s unknowingly defending FARC at this time. Or knowingly??? Obama remembered Detroit, wants to subsidize the car manufacturers into the Gore-Kerry fuel efficiency mandates. They should be making awesome cars. And electric cars. And we should be prepping the grid for them.
8:55 — McCain turned Colombia pretty deftly, in my eyes, on Obama. Obama saw Ahmedinijad coming and started snickering again. Still is. I don’t know what he thinks is going on in the region around Colombia. I hope he doesn’t.
8:58 — I hate these faux-Reagan anecdotes about regular Joe Winebottles. I did like McCain’s first one about Joe Wurzelbacher, because the dude’s great. Reminds me of a lot of the very smart people I knew in my previous life. Hey, there’s McCain talking up Joe again. How come McCain seems to be reading this everytime except when he needs to talk about cash tax rebates to non-taxpayers?
9:02 — I certainly hope that Obama and the democratic congress celebrate the dethroning of King George for the next two years instead of passing Obama’s healthcare plan. If he wins, of course, and McCain hasn’t landed the heavy body blows he needs to.
9:03 — McCain’s got his own 95% claim here. Talking about the interstate health insurance market. Obama will take the bait; will McCain have the counterargument this time? Being a good free marketeer in this answer. Good answer all around. Good to bring up the prospect of an all-Democrat DC. With apologies to the heroic Admiral Stockdale, Americans like gridlock. I know I do. [--"Coming to America" reference] (Obama didn’t take the bait.)
9:08 — Oops. McCain just said that he would impose a litmus test. Sorta. It was a good one. Sorta. Obama’s judges will be scary. Anti-2nd-amendment, internationalist, anti-constitutionist, poor judges. [Added later: McCain didn’t really have a litmus test there, what he did was say that he wouldn’t nominate a judge who openly championed Roe v. Wade. He basically said that would disqualify them as prudent judges who’d seriously interpret the constitution. That’s a perfectly sound position since judge’s shouldn’t weigh in on decisions beyond their scope or jurisdiction.
Obama supporter and Wisconsin lawprof Ann Althouse liked McCain in that round:
9:07: The Supreme Court. McCain notes his record of voting for judicial nominees based on their qualifications. This is a good point, because Obama has voted against highly qualified Supreme Court nominees, while McCain voted for Justice Ginsburg. They’re both against “litmus tests” (of course).
9:11 — For a second, I thought McCain’s would make the libertarian conservative policy position on abortion. Essentially, the same as Clinton’s: safe, legal, rare—with the addition of socially discouraged. He didn’t though, went after Obama for his vote of present on the Illinois legislature Born-Alive bill.
9:15 — “Eloquence,” again. “Nuance,” McCain!
9:15 — Education question, and I liked the question, essentially, “We pay the most per capita, get the worst results. Why? How to fix it?”
9:17 — I’m not a fan of Obama’s tuition for community service plan, nor his plan for a public activist institution that rivals the military in size and funding. Work-study is good, tuition rates need to go down, public school funding should be increased. I don’t know how to do it, but I’d start by cutting just about every department that ends in “studies” and merge them with other related departments. (Or merge them into a super-department called General Grievance Studies or call it a No-Rigor-Needed-Major.)
9:21 — John McCain and I are huge fans of vouchers. Obama doesn’t like them. Seems to think they can’t be paid for. Doesn’t know how they work or wants to obfuscate.
9:24 — I’m one of the few fans of NCLB. The plan was to test the schools and teachers, not the students. Schools adapted to save their skins and trash their students. Still a good idea. McCain calls it an important first step, I agree.
9:25 — Ub dub dub duhh dub uhh dub, aaaaaand, dub uh dub. Who uh who uh dub uh.
9:26 — Obama appeals to data. Looking forward to seeing the “Fact Checkers” skew this one tomorrow.
9:27 — Final statements. McCain goes first: new direction. I’m a reformer, I take on these thieving bastards in DC. Careful steward of your tax dollars. Health care plug. He would’ve won this debate, hands-down, if he could articulate what a refundable tax credit is. Why can’t he, by gum? Honored and humbled if given the opportunity to serve again.
9:29 — Obama up. Blames “the policy of the last 8 years” for the economic crisis. I won’t bet any money that the fact-checkers clarify that steaming loaf. Brighter days are ahead. Goverment needs to “invest” in America. Policies that’ll lift wages (he means minimum wage hikes, not corporate tax cuts, no doubt). I’ll work every single day, tirelessly on your behalf.
9:32 — Wrap up. Both candidates did better than in the previous debates. I guess they just needed to sit down. McCain missed a fat hanging curve that’s been sitting in his wheelhouse for the past two weeks. Obama pretended to be a moderate, showing a little of his leftism from time to time. (Although not as bad as in the last debate: nobody’s mentioned his talk about corporate tax cuts being money “out of the system” in that debate, a revealing perspective, I thought.) Both candidates presented a good front; McCain’s politics appeal to me a great deal more—if only he could better articulate the details of these competing tax and healthcare plans.
10:10 — Time for a few brews and a little karaoke. Think I’m in the mood to warble out some Gordon Lightfoot.
Today’s News
Thursday, September 25th, 2008I thought Bush’s address explained the issues pretty well and made a good case.
I even almost enjoyed Barney Frank’s reaction aired on CNBC afterwards, in which he basically claimed the thing would pass in the next few days with a few changes (most of which I think are sensible but not apparently exactly what I was thinking appropriate).
I’ve been diggin’ CNBC the past few days: no O’Reilly, Hannity, Olbermann, or Campbell Browns. For a long time I’ve said the only reliable news reporting can be found in the business and sports pages—not so on television for sports at least since ESPN jumped the shark, but apparently the business reporters on CNBC still take their credibility seriously enough. (Larry Kudlow and Jim Cramer are the only open partisans, but neither pulls much crap on their shows. Maria Bartiromo is spectacular. Then again, I could do without this Donny Deutsch character who just came on.
Other noteworthy news of the day: Change they need. Looking forward to hearing what the Kurdish parties think, if this gets any coverage.
Back to work.
(Break: Very funny rejected text.
I Voted
Wednesday, February 6th, 2008And if you look closely, you can see me. (The lone vote in my precinct for Fred Thompson, long out of the race.)
City-wide, I’m nothing short of astonished that the Urbana Park District tax hike failed by only 49.53 to 50.47.
Two Items
Tuesday, January 8th, 2008From the rankings of baby names for 2007, I see that parents chose to name their children after me quite often. My name was the 50
John Fund’s story about the omnibus budget bill awaiting the President’s signature pointed out some exciting things. Please don’t disappoint me, GWB. Great opportunity that can’t be squandered.
Displeasing
Wednesday, May 2nd, 2007Rod Blagojevich is enthusiastic about signing a piece of legislation to make Illinois less free. Surprise, surprise. The real surprise is that bill passing the house. That shocked me when I heard it last night.
The news that Champaign hopes to reverse their ban in May is much more welcome news.
Looks like I’ll have to hurry up and finish school so I can move somewhere decent before there aren’t any decent places left.
It irritates me to no end that people are so eager and expectant for government to solve their problems by stepping in and telling businesses what kind of customers they can cater to—in this case, just to rid these gripers of the petty inconvenience of having to change their clothes after a night of drinking.
Update: The worst thing about this is the no smoking within 15 feet of an entrance clause. Depending on how you define entrances, that could really piss off the folks at Tumble Inn, who just spent a large amount of money building an outdoor smoking area. Who’s going to enforce this in any case? The state health department?
In Today’s News-Gazette
Wednesday, April 18th, 2007While waiting for my turn at the barber this morning, I saw this incredibly sad classified ad:
HOTTEST PROM dress of the season. Flirt by Maggie Sottero. Sapphire, size 18. Bought at M2 on January 4th. Not going to prom, paid $400 sell for $275.
I hope her former date sees that and realizes what a jerk he is. Or she—you never know with the kids these days. The backstory I’ve created in my head involves a scenario gone bad from the teen movies where the popular boy brings an unpopular girl to prom to win a bet that he can make her prom queen. Hopefully she finds a nice date and has a good time.
Also, an article about yesterday’s election results. Tom Bruno (who’s got a sweet ‘stache) sez:
I think the big losers in this election were the influences from Urbana who sought to come over here and put an Urbana stamp on the city council. It was rejected by the voters.
I admit to making modest attempts from Urbana to influence the Champaign voters into putting an anti-Urbana stamp on the city council. As an Urbana resident, I don’t have much of any ability to effect my own city government, but realize that what Champaign does, Urbana will follow.
Champaign mayor Jerry Schweighart has the right attitude:
I don’t think it’ll be a total repeal [of the smoking ban.] There will be some compromises made.
I think every sensible adult in Champaign county can agree that variety is an appropriate goal. I want to be able to go to a bar where I can watch a game, read a few papers, and smoke while I’m doing it; and I want to be able to bring non-smokers to bars where they won’t be uncomfortable. I think that enough non-smokers have expressed their appreciation during the ban that the niche market has proven itself and at least a few bar owners will maintain non-smoking environments in their establishments, and I’ll continue to patronize them sometimes. To get that kind of variety will require some kind of a compromise: I suggested they offer a slightly discounted liquor license fee for bars that commit to remain non-smoking. Offer a carrot.
I’m sure the Radio Maria bar will stay non-smoking and possibly the Seven Saints bar or whatever it’s called that’s opening up at the corner of University and Market on Friday, since both were built when the ban was in effect and didn’t have proper ventilation systems installed. Probably Ko-Fusion and a few others that I don’t go to. I could see Guido’s only allowing smoking downstairs.
Don’t Forget to Vote
Tuesday, April 17th, 2007Tomorrow’s an important day in the city of Champaign. You can check your ballot at the county clerk’s website.
I beseech you to vote for Deb Feinen and Karen Foster for the city council.
If the two of them are elected, we should have an opportunity for a sensible compromise.
Results: Are to my liking.
A Conjecture
Wednesday, March 28th, 2007On Friday, the Cardinals will play an exhibition game against their AAA Affiliate in Memphis. If there is a gameday for it, it’ll be here.
I’ve added it to the rest of the links below. The game will be televised on Fox Sports Midwest.
Also, Rod Blagojevich is starting to really get on my nerves.
Sam Alito on the Hill
Sunday, March 11th, 2007I’m very pleased with the most recent two supreme court justices, John Roberts and Sam Alito. Sam Alito took to the mound today to throw out the first pitch in a D-Rays vs. Yankees spring training game. Judging by the picture, I’d say that he threw a pretty good four-seam fastball, although it looks like his elbow’s flying open. Gotta yank that sucker to your side and maximize rotational velocity.
Nice article. (Hat tip to Baseball Musings)
Votes Coming In
Wednesday, February 28th, 2007Today was the day of the Champaign city council primaries, to cull the field down from nine candidates to six candidates for the real vote in April to elect three at-large council members. Results are starting to post at the Champaign County Clerk’s ‘site. To refresh, I’m hoping that Feinen, Glithero, Henley, and Foster are all among the six on the ballot. With 22 of 40 districts reporting amid extremely low turnout, Feinen and Foster look like they’re in great shape, Henley and Glithero are both in the bottom three, but within distance of the sixth spot. Some good news is that the top three in this primary (with 22 precincts reporting) are Feinenyay!, Brunoboo!, and Fosteryay!.
I’d like to see these guys rent some vans and haul every registered voter they can find smoking out in the street to their polling places. That would be hilarious.
Completely unrelated, but the Walmart on High Cross Road is selling “Unofficial St. Patrick’s Day” T-shirts in order to cash in on this coming Friday’s asinine festivities. That surprised me, but maybe it shouldn’t have.
The final tallies:
Deborah Frank Feinen 1,857 18.57
Thomas A. "Tom" Bruno 1,642 16.42
Karen B. Foster 1,510 15.1
Giraldo Rosales 1,252 12.52
Patricia A. Avery 1,241 12.41
Annette B. Williams 815 8.15
Michael Henley 774 7.74
Bill Glithero 728 7.28
Freddie Gordon 157 1.57
It’s too bad we couldn’t muster up another 41 Henley supporters.
